This is where the optional rule from XGE comes in. The only difference between this case and the blind-AOE case is that the rule does not tell us what happens in this case. What about non-AOE spells and the rule from Xanathar's?Ī spell that targets a creature or object also still follows the general rule that the covered point cannot be targeted, but obviously the second line does not apply. With a seeing wizard or non-AOE spells the other two cases are possible There's no contradiction at all here between the first and second lines of the spell or how they interact. The rules do not allow targeting that point and instead say that the effect comes into being on the near side of the wall which is what happens. So, in the example you give, the blind wizard would try to target a point behind a wall with fog cloud. In this case, the spell simply comes into being on the near side of the obstruction where it follows all the normal rules. The rule is simply telling you what happens after you try to target it. You still cannot target the other side of the obstruction so you are still following the top line. This special case applies only to an AOE cast while the caster cannot see. However, rules then go on to create a special case that tells you how to apply the rule in a specific circumstance: This gives a broad, general rule that covers anything that targets something. #2 - Fog cloud would appear on the wizard's side of the wall Like, if you cast magic missile at a monster who's actually an illusion, or try to cast cure wounds on someone you don't know is a simulacrum. "You do the spell but nothing happens" (#3) may be correct when the player chooses a target that is invalid for a reason the character doesn't know yet. Because it has to be cast at a creature you can see. If our blind wizard tries to cast magic missile, well, no, he can't. "No, you can't" (#1) is correct when the player tries to choose a target that his character has no way to even identify. The rule about the effect ending up on the near side of the obstruction only applies when you're placing an area of effect, not when the spell targets a single creature or object. But all of these outcomes are appropriate in some cases. You can't place the fog cloud behind the unseen wall, and if you try, it ends up in front of the wall instead. The relationship between those two sentences can be resolved as You can't do A. Suddenly, the wizard gains some kind of radar that allows him to check if the path in front of him is free, and circulate quickly in a maze made of prismatic walls without harm. What bothers me is that the first option seemed to have an broad consensus (~90 person before the associated answer update): not only does it render the second sentence obsolete, but it allows the player to gain information on it's environment without spending actions. if you feel this falls into invalid targeting. "You say the words and do the gestures, but nothing happens."Īs found here, Xanathar's Guide to Everything offers optional rules for invalid targets - that you can use. This would be the application of the rule's second sentence. It looks like the fog cloud appeared closer than what you intended." "Even though you placed your spell 60 feet away, you feel a strong humidity on your skin. This is the strict application of the rule's first sentence. I mostly see 3 options (but feel free to add others): How should the DM react, according to the rules? Let's assume a blind wizard stuck is in a maze, facing a wall he's not aware of. You can't do A, but if you do, then B happens. If you place an area of effect at a point that you can't see and an obstruction, such as a wall, is between you and that point, the point of origin comes into being on the near side of that obstruction.Īnd now suddenly I'm lost. This seems straightforward: you can't target a point/creature/object/thing behind total cover. To target something, you must have a clear path to it, so it can't be behind total cover. I'm puzzled by the " a clear path to the target" rule.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |